Produkcja późnych typów bransolet wężowatych na przykładzie znalezisk z cmentarzyska w Weklicach, stan. 7, pow. elbląski
Instytut Archeologii i Etnologii, Polskiej Akademii Nauk, Al. Solidarności 105, PL 00-140 Warszawa
Muzeum Archeologiczne w Gdańsku, ul. Mariacka 25/26, PL 80-833 Gdańsk
Data nadesłania: 20-01-2020
Data ostatniej rewizji: 14-03-2020
Data akceptacji: 07-04-2020
Data publikacji: 31-12-2020
Wiadomości Archeologiczne 2020;LXXI(71):161-187
The subject of this study is the technology of manufacture of late forms of silver shield-headed bracelets. The analysis is based on the bracelets from the Wielbark Culture cemetery at Weklice, Elbląg County, in N Poland (Fig. 1–3). They correspond to Blume III or Wójcik IVB and V types, and appear in single- and double-spiral variants. They are dated to the beginning of the Late Roman Period. The majority of such bracelets come from cemeteries located along the shores of the former bay of the Vistula Lagoon, whose remnant is present-day Drużno Lake. In antiquity, richly ornamented snake-headed bracelets with regular, strap and multi-spiral bodies were a distinctive type of women’s accessories. They are known from the Hellenistic Period (Fig. 4). They were also manufactured in goldsmith’s workshops of the Roman Empire (Fig. 5–7). In Roman goldsmithing, they were in fashion in the 1st and 2nd centuries CE; interest declined at the beginning of the 3rd century. The technique used (forging), the similarity of shapes and the regularity of profiles indicate that matrices or dies (swages) were used in their manufacture. The best-known example of blacksmithing and goldsmithing tools used to make ornaments utilising this method is the deposit from Daorson (BIH), the former capital of Illyria (Z. Marić 1979). Similar technology was used to craft the Roman snake-bracelets and snake-rings from the jeweller’s hoard from Snettisham, Norfolk (GB), dating to the mid-2nd century CE (C. Johns 1997). It is assumed that barbarian goldsmith’s workshops used raw materials imported from the Roman Empire. So far, no traces of exploitation and processing of non-ferrous metal ores in the Roman period have been recorded in Poland, allowing a conclusion that local workshops melted down Roman imports. The share of silver in the denarii varied and generally decreased as a result of successive reforms introduced by ruling emperors. However, metallurgical analyses (Table 1) show that shield-headed bracelets were made from high-grade raw material containing about 92–97% Ag, which excludes the possibility that the alloys were created by melting coins with varied silver content, e.g. fourrées. No archaeological sources confirm that the ‘barbarians’ had the ability to refine precious metals. Therefore, the raw material probably came from scrap vessels made of alloys containing 92–97% Ag. Given the enormous practical knowledge of goldsmiths of that time, the metal they had available was probably selected with respect to alloy composition. Raw material could also have been obtained by importing bars containing 94–95% Ag; however, such finds (known mainly from the frontier areas of the Roman Empire) date only to the 3rd and 4th century (K. Painter 1981). The fragments of cups discovered at the cemetery of the Wielbark Culture in Czarnówko, Lębork County, are an indication that high-grade silver from Roman vessels was used in Pomerania in the Roman Period. Metallurgical analyses show that they were made of alloys containing 96–99% Ag (J. Schuster 2018). In recreating the technology of manufacture of the bracelets in question, we also used our own observations concerning the assessment of alloy quality. Raw material was forged into long strips (up to 25 cm in length in the case of single-spiral forms, and up to 50 cm in length in the case of double-spiral forms) on which delamination and chipping could occur. They were the result of both the heterogeneity of silver and errors made during forging and are often still visible on final products (Fig. 8). This was possible due to the reduced hardness and resulting ductility of high-grade silver alloys with only a few percent of copper added. A common way of making the basic form of metal objects, both in Roman and ‘barbarian’ craftsmanship, was forging. Dies were used to create ornaments of repetitive shapes. They were usually two-piece sets (Fig. 9), with a top and bottom swage. The technique involves placing a heated rod or strip between the parts of a die and forging while shifting it until a suitable profile is obtained. Dies were basic elements of a blacksmith’s shop (Fig. 10, 11); in goldsmith’s workshops, a simplified version consisting of only the bottom swage was used. The technological properties of the alloys required the ‘cold’ forging method, during which the material changed to a fine-crystalline structure and hardened. The workpiece was occasionally soaked to recrystallise and plasticise the alloy. The use of this technology in barbarian metalwork is confirmed by the find of an anvil with ‘nail headers’ from Vimose on the island of Funen (DK), with a negative impression of a profile for forging on its underside (Fig. 12, 13). The bows of the Weklice bracelets were also forged in the manner described. Based on precise measurements, it can even be assumed that almost identical forming swages, with a negative impression of the design of approx. 10.5 mm in width, were used. Slight differences in shape may result from the finishing treatment of an already forged bracelet (Fig. 14). Creation of a shield-headed bracelet was time-consuming work, requiring a lot of knowledge and skill. First, a silver bar was cast, which was then forged into a long strip. Forging a semi-finished product in a swage required the involvement of two people and excellent work organisation. The use of a metal stamp, shaped in the outline of the profile on the swage, made it possible to obtain a deep relief (Fig. 15). Observation of the undersides of bases and heads of snake bracelets indicates that they were formed slightly differently. The underside of the heads shows traces of irregular impacts (Fig. 16:1–3), which indicates that these parts were made using the free forging technique. Such a bracelet creation process was applied in the reconstruction presented here, with the body forged on a swage, and the heads hammered on a wooden and lead pad (Fig. 17, 18). Forged heads of the original Weklice bracelets are irregular in shape, and even the subsequent application of engraved and punched ornaments on the face did not fully mask this asymmetry. Free forging and die forging were the initial techniques that made it possible create a certain section of a decoration. Bracelets forged in this manner have uneven face surfaces. The next step was to even and refine the body by smoothing and grinding, first with a file and then with grindstones. To smooth the surface of ornaments made of soft alloys, a flat iron burin or a small chisel with a wide, hardened blade could also be used. Traces of such treatments in the form of scratched, parallel lines are visible on the analysed examples of Weklice bracelets. The edge of a polygonal file was used to divide the heads and collars and make grooves accentuating raised ridges (Fig. 19:1.2). An ornament in the form of two main motifs made with punches, i.e. incised lines imitating a twisted or beaded wire and an alternately stippled snake-zigzag (Fig. 19, 20), was later applied on the face surfaces of the bracelets. During these operations, washers were used to prevent damage to the thin sheet metal. A tool with flat blade, a type of small chisel, was commonly used (Fig. 19:3.4). Chasers with a curved undercut in the blade and pronounced, lateral teeth, which gave a clear semi-circular imprint, were rarely used. Usually, such a punch would leave a distinct mark of fangs on the sides (Fig. 19:5). Oblique, parallel lines imitating twisted wires were made with similar punches in imitation of beaded wires. In the case of the former, a better effect was achieved using a chisel with a semi-circular notch in the blade and thickened teeth on the sides. The stamped pattern had the shape of an oblique, slightly S-shaped line (Fig. 19:6). Another variant of this ornamentation consisted of incised ridges separated with an undecorated band (Fig. 19:7). The decorative snake (zigzag) motif was made by punching regular points on alternate sides of a raised ridge (Fig. 19:8.9). The final step was polishing, giving the decoration a shine. In ancient times, gold and silver jewellery was commonly polished with semi-precious stones. Polishers made of iron were also used, providing decorations made of silver, gold and even tin alloys with a perfect shine (Fig. 21). Another method of finishing ornaments was patination. In antiquity, blackening of silver products was fashionable and was probably also used by barbarian communities. In the case of the described shield-headed bracelets with flatly displayed patterns, it was even advisable to leave the blackened depressions in the stamped ornaments, as it intensified – against the background of the polished smooth surface – the impression of the ornament’s three-dimensionality (Fig. 22). The appearance of shield-headed bracelets in the Wielbark Culture was undoubtedly the effect of contacts between the local communities and the Roman Empire. The result of these contacts was a huge transfer of technical knowledge, crafting skills and aesthetic concepts, among others. The ancient, naturalistic snake motif, fashionable and common in the 1st and 2nd century CE, was adapted and stylistically transformed into its own ‘barbarian’ design. This phenomenon intensified in the second half of the 2nd century and the early 3rd century. The bracelets from Weklice described here were probably made in a local blacksmith/goldsmith workshop to the order of elites living in the settlement clusters of the Wielbark Culture, which stretched around the shores of the then bay of the Vistula Lagoon. These workshops based their manufacturing on their own technological tradition, preferring blacksmithing techniques, including the use of dies with elaborate profiles. This phenomenon can be observed not only in the metalwork of the Wielbark Culture, but also in other Germanic societies living in the south-western regions of the Baltic Sea coast.
ALMGREN O. 1923: Studien über nordeuropäische Fibelformen der ersten nachchristlichen Jahrhunderte mit Berücksichtigung der provinzialrömischen und südrussischen Formen, Mannus-Bibliothek 32, Leipzig2.
ANDERSSON K. 1993: Romartida guldsmide i Norden I. Katalog, Aun 17, Uppsala.
ANDERSSON K. 1995: Romartida guldsmide i Norden III. Övrigasmycken, tekniskanalys och verkstadsgrupper, Aun 21, Uppsala.
ARMBRUSTER B. 2012: Feinschmiedewerkzeuge vom Beginn der Metallurgie bis in die Römische Kaiserzeit, [w:] A. Pesch, R. Blankenfeldt (red.), Goldsmith Mysteries. Archaeological, pictorial and documentary evidence from the 1st millennium AD in the northern Europe, Schriften des Archäologischen Landesmuseums, Ergz.Reihe 8, Neumünster, 59–85.
BELIAVETS V., PRZYBYŁA M.J., VORONIATOV S. 2018: Gold rings from Pilipki in Podlasie: some remarks on the connections between the Wielbark Culture and Scandinavia at the close of the Early and the beginnings of the Late Roman Period, [w:] B. Niezabitowska-Wiśniewska et alii (red.), STUDIA BARBARICA. Profesorowi Andrzejowi Kokowskiemu w 65 rocznicę urodzin, tom I, Lublin, 158–187.
BERGER D. 2012: Bronzezeitliche Färbetechniken an Metallobjekten nördlich der Alpen. Eine archäometallurgische Studie zur prähistorischen Anwendung von Tauschierung und Patinierung anhand von Artefakten und Experimenten, Forschungsberichte des Landesmuseums für Vorgeschichte Halle 2, Halle an der Salle.
BERGLAND H. 2013: Die Kunst des Schmiedens. Das große Lehrbuch der traditionellen Technik, Bad Aibling.
BEZZENBERGER A. 1904: Analysen vorgeschichtlicher Bronzen Ostpreussens, Königsberg.
BLUME E. 1912: Die germanischen Stämme und die Kulturen zwischen Oder und Passarge zur römischen Kaiserzeit, I Teil: Text, Mannus-Bibliothek 8, Würzburg.
BLUME E. 1915: Die germanischen Stämme und die Kulturen zwischen Oder und Passarge zur römischen Kaiserzeit, II Teil: Material (red. M. Schultze), Mannus-Bibliothek 14, Würzburg.
BŁAŻEWSKI S. 1954: Pomiary twardości metali, Warszawa.
BORN H. 1993: Multi-coloured antique bronze statues, [w:] S. La Niece, P. Craddock (red.), Metal Plating and Patination. Cultural, Technical and Historical Developments, Oxford, 19–29.
BREGLIA L. 1941: Catalogo delle oreficerie del Museo Nazionale di Napoli, Roma.
BREPOHL E. 2001: The Theory and Practice of Goldsmithing, Portland.
BURSCHE A. 1983: Moneta i kruszec w kulturze wielbarskiej w okresie późnorzymskim, „Przegląd Archeologiczny” 31, 47–90.
BURSCHE A. 1988: Kontakty Cesarstwa rzymskiego z ludnością kultury wielbarskiej w III i IV w. w świetle źródeł numizmatycznych, [w:] J. Gurba, A. Kokowski (red.), Kultura wielbarska w młodszym okresie rzymskim, materiały z konferencji I, Lublin, 37–50.
BURSCHE A. 1998: Złote medaliony rzymskie w Barbaricum. Symbolika prestiżu i władzy społeczeństw barbarzyńskich u schyłku starożytności, ŚWIATOWIT, Suppl. Series A: Antiquity II, Warszawa.
von CARNAP-BORNHEIM C. 2001: The Social Position of the Germanic Goldsmith A.D. 0–500, [w:] B. Magnus (red.), Roman Gold and the Development of the Early Germanic Kingdoms. Aspects of technical, socio-political, socio-economic, artistic and intellectual development, A.D. 1–500. – Symposium in Stockholm 14–16 November 1997, Kungl. Vitterhets Historie och Antikvitets Akademien. Konferenser 51, Stockholm, 263–278.
CIEŚLIŃSKI A. 2010: Kulturelle Veränderungen und Besiedlungsabläufe im Gebiet der Wielbark-Kultur an Łyna, Pasłęka und oberer Drwęca, Berliner Beiträge zur Vor- und Frühgeschichte NF 17, Berlin.
CIEŚLIŃSKI A., JARZEC A. 2018: Kartoteka Marty Schmiedehelm jako źródło do poznania cmentarzyska w Krośnie, pow. elbląski na przykładzie inwentarza z grobu 24, [w:] B. Niezabitowska et alii (red.), STUDIA BARBARICA. Profesorowi Andrzejowi Kokowskiemu w 65. rocznicę urodzin, tom II, Lublin, 354–366.
COSACK E. 1979: Die Fibeln der Älteren Römischen Kaiserzeit in der Germania libera (Dänemark, DDR, BRD, Niederlande, CSSR). Eine technologisch-archäologische Analyse. Teil 1: Armbrustfibeln, Rollenkappenfibeln, Augenfibeln, Göttinger Schriften zur Vor- und Frühgeschichte 19, Neumünster.
COWELL M.R. ET ALII 1983: M.R. Cowell, S. La Niece, N.D. Meeks, W.A. Oddy, R. Holmes, The Scientific Examination of the Thetford Treasure, [w:] C. Johns, T. Potter, The Thetford treasure. Roman Jewellery and Silver, London, 56–67.
COWELL M.R., HOOK D.R. 2010: The Analysis of the Metal Artefacts, [w:] C. Johns, The Hoxne Late Roman Treasure. Gold Jewellery and Silver Plate, London, 175–183.
DEPPERT-LIPPITZ B. 1985: Griechischer Goldschmuck, Kulturgeschichte der antiken Welt 27, Mainz am Rhein.
DOBAT A.S. 2008: Werkzeuge aus kaiserzeitlichen Heeresausrüstungsopfern. Mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der Fundplätze Illerup Ådal und Vimose, Jernalderen i Nordeuropa, Århus.
DOMERGUE C. 2008: Les mines antiques. La production des métaux aux époques grecque et romaine, Paris.
ENGELMAN Z. 2007: Pozłotnictwo, Zielona Góra.
FLOROW A.W. 1989: Artystyczna obróbka metali (tłum. A. i K. Błaszkowscy), Warszawa.
FRĄCKOWSKA A. 2013: Srebrne kufle gdańskie XVII i XVIII wieku. Typologia, stylistyka, ikonografia, Warszawa.
GAITZSCH W. 1980: Eiserne römische Werkzeuge. Studien zur römischen Werkzeugkunde in Italien und der nördlichen Provinzen des Imperium Romanum I–II, B.A.R. Int. Series 78, Oxford.
GAN P. 2015: Charakterystyka chemiczna zabytków z cmentarzyska w Czarnówku – analizy wprowadzające, [w:] J. Andrzejowski (red.), Czarnówko, stan. 5. Cmentarzyska z późnej starożytności na Pomorzu, część 1, Monumenta Archaeologica Barbarica. Series Gemina V, Lębork-Warszawa, 175–214.
GITLER H., PONTING M. 2003: The Silver Coinage of Septimius Severus and his Family (193–211 AD). A Study of the Chemical Composition of the Roman and Eastern Issues, Glaux. Collana di Studi e Ricerche di Numismatica 16, Milano.
GRADOWSKI M. 1980: Dawne złotnictwo: technika i terminologia, Warszawa2.
GUSTAVS S. 1989: Werkabfälle eines germanischen Feinschmiedes von Klein Köris, Kr. Königs Wusterhausen, Veröffentlichungen des Museums für Ur- und Frühgeschichte Potsdam 23, Potsdam, 147–180.
HAHUŁA K., WOŁĄGIEWICZ R. 2001: Grzybnica. Ein Gräberfeld mit Steinkreisen der Wielbark-Kultur in Pommern, Monumenta Archaeologica Barbarica VIII, Warszawa-Koszalin.
HUMER F. 2006: (red.) Legionsadler und Druidenstab. Vom Legionslager zur Donaumetropole. Katalogband, Katalog des Niederösterreichischen Landesmuseums N.F. 462, St. Pölten.
I GOTI 1994: I Goti, Milano.
ILIESCU O. 1965: Nouvelles informations relatives aux lingots romains d’or, trouvés en Transylvanie, „Revue des Études Sud-Est Européennes” III/1–2,269–281.
ILKJÆR J., JOUTTIJÄRVI A., ANDRESEN J. 1994: Proveniensbestemmelse af jern fra Illerup ådal – et pilot projekt, Illerup ådal. Småskrifter 1, Højbjerg.
JOHNS C. 1997: The Snettisham Roman Jeweller’s Hoard, London.
JOUTTIJÄRVI A. 2009: Copper alloys, silver and gold, [w:] L. Boye, U. Lund Hansen (red.), Wealth and Prestige – An Analysis of Rich Graves from Late Roman Iron Age on Eastern Zealand, Denmark, Kroppedal. Studier i Astronomi –Nyere Tid – Arkæologi II, Taastrup, 213–253.
KASPRZYCKA M. 1999: Tło paleogeograficzne osadnictwa Żuław Elbląskich w pierwszym tysiącleciu naszej ery, ADALBERTUS. Tło kulturowo‐geograficzne wyprawy misyjnej św. Wojciecha na pogranicze polsko‐pruskie 5, Warszawa.
KNOBLOCH M. 1977: Złotnictwo, Warszawa.
KOCH W. 2011: Style w architekturze. Arcydzieła budownictwa europejskiego od antyku po czasy współczesne (tłum. W. Baraniewski et alii), Warszawa.
KOZAKIEWICZ S. 1969: (red.) Słownik terminologiczny sztuk pięknych, Warszawa.
KUNISZ A. 1969: Chronologia napływu pieniądza rzymskiego na ziemie Małopolski, Wrocław.
KUŹMIN A.M. 2003: Organizacja mennic i techniki mennicze w Polsce XVI—XVII w., Biblioteczka Polskiego Towarzystwa Numizmatycznego 1, Warszawa.
LANG J. 1997: The Scientific Examination of the Hoard. Manufacturing Techniques, [w:] C. JOHNS, The Snettisham Roman Jeweller’s Hoard, London, 61–67.
MACHAJEWSKI H. 2013: Gronowo. Ein Gräberfeld der Wielbark-Kultur in Westpommern, Monumenta Archaeologica Barbarica XVIII, Warszawa-Szczecin-Gdańsk.
MARIĆ Z. 1979: Depo pronađen u ilirskom gradu Daors. u (2. st. pr. n. e.), „Glasnik Zemaljskog muzeja Bosne i Hercegovine u Sarajevu”, Arheologija NS XXXIII (1978), 23–113.
NATUNIEWICZ M. 2000: „Nowe” znaleziska ze starych wykopalisk. Ocalałe materiały archeologiczne z okresu wpływów rzymskich z okolic Elbląga, [w:] J. Kolendo, W. Nowakowski (red.), Antiquitates Prussiae. Studia z archeologii dawnych ziem pruskich, Warszawa, 105–206.
NATUNIEWICZ-SEKUŁA M. 2017: The Craft of the Goldsmith in Wielbark Culture in the Light of the Finds from the Cemetery at Weklice, Elbląg Commune and Other Necropolis of Roman Period from Elbląg Heights. Technological Studies of Selected Aspects, SprArch. 69, 185–233.
NATUNIEWICZ-SEKUŁA M., OKULICZ-KOZARYN J. 2011: Weklice. A Cemetery of the Wielbark Culture on the Eastern Margin of Vistula Delta (Excavations 1984–2004), Monumenta Archaeologica Barbarica XVII, Warszawa.
NAUMANN H-J., SIEBLIST U., WURM T. 2001: Rekonstruktion –Prüfstand für Beobachtungen, [w:] S. Fröhlich (red.), Gold für Ewigkeit. Das germanische Fürstengrab von Gommern. Begleitband zur Sonderausstellung vom 18. 10. 2000 bis 28.02.2001 im Landesmuseum für Vorgeschichte Halle (Saale), Halle (Salle), 190–203.
NIELSEN F.O.S., WATT M. 2010: Sorte Muld – et bornholmsk kongesæde?, [w:] M. Andersen, P.O. Nielsen (red.), Danefæ. Skatte fra den danske muld til Hendes Majestæt Dronning Margrethe 2, København, 144–148.
NIEMEYER B. 2004: Die silbernen Halbkugelbecher vom Typ Leuna. Fundkomplexe und Interpretationen, Herstellungstechnik und Datierung, B.A.R. Int. Series 1250, Oxford.
NIEMEYER B. 2007: Trassologie an römischen Silber. Herstellungstechnische Untersuchungen am Hildesheimer Silberfund, B.A.R. Int. Series 1621, Oxford.
OHLHAVER H. 1939: Der germanische Schmied und sein Werkzeug, Hamburger Schriften zur Vorgeschichte und Germanischen Frühgeschichte 2, Leipzig.
PAINTER K.S. 1981: Two Roman Silver Ingots from Kent, „Archaeologia Cantiana” 97, 201–207.
PETROVSZKY R. 2006: Der Hortfund von Hagenbach, [w:] J. Stadler (red.), Der Barbarenschatz. Geraubt und im Rhein versunken, Speyer, 192–195.
PIASKOWSKI J. 1957: Metalurgia w „Historii naturalnej” G. Pliniusza Starszego, „Archeologia” IX, 99–120.
PIKE A., COWELL M. 1997: The Scientific Examination of the Hoard. Analyses of Materials, [w:] C. JOHNS, The Snettisham Roman Jeweller’s Hoard, London, 50–61.
PIRZIO BIROLI STEFANELLI L. 1992: L’Oro dei Romani. Gioielli di età imperiale, Il metallo: mito e fortuna nel mondo antico 3, Roma.
PLEINER R. 1962: Staré evropské kovářstvi. Stav metalografického výzkumu, Praha.
REHREN TH. 2003: Crucibles as Reaction Vessels in Ancient Metallurgy, [w:] P. Craddock, J. Lang (red.), Mining and Metal Production through the Ages, London, 207–215.
REHREN TH., KRAUS K. 1999: Cupel and crucible: the refining of debased silver in the Colonia Ulpia Traiana, Xanten, „Journal of Roman Archeology” 12, 263–272.
RIHA E. 1990: Der römische Schmuck aus Augst und Kaiseraugst, Forschungen in Augst 10, Augst.
RIHA E., STERN W.B. 1982: Die römischen Löffel aus Augst und Kaiseraugst. Archäologische und metallanalytische Untersuchungen, Forschungen in Augst 5, Augst.
ROCHACKI J.A. 2008: Techniki zdobnicze na powierzchniach gładkich stosowane w dawnym złotnictwie, [w:] K. Kluczwajd (red.), Dawna i nowsza biżuteria w Polsce. Materiały z VIII Sesji Naukowej z cyklu Rzemiosło artystyczne i wzornictwo w Polsce, Toruń, 45–55.
ROMAN REFLECTIONS... 1996: Roman Reflections in Scandinavia (red. E. Björklund), Roma.
ROTHENHÖFER P 2007: Iam et plumbum excoquere docuimus? – Zum Phänomen der germanischen Bleiproduktion im nördlichen Sauerland während der römischen Kaiserzeit, [w:] W. Melzer, T. Capelle (red.), Bleibergbau und Bleiverarbeitung während der römischen Kaiserzeit im rechtsrheinischen Barbaricum, Soester Beiträge zur Archäologie 8, Soest, 47–55.
RUSEVA-SLOKOSKA L. 1991: Roman Jewellery. A collection of Roman jewellery in the National Archaeological Museum – Sofia, Sofia.
RÜTTI B., AITKEN C. 2003: Der Schatz. Das römische Silber aus Kaiseraugst neu entdeckt, Augster Museumshefte 32, Augst.
SÁNCHEZ E., LANSING MAISH S. 2014: The Hidden Lives of Ancient Objects: Conserving the Berthouville Treasure and Four Missoria, [w:] K. Lapatin (red.), The Berthouville Silver Treasure and Roman Luxury, Los Angeles, 107–125.
SCHUSTER J. 2014: Złoty wiek – Czarnówko w okresie wpływów rzymskich i w okresie wędrówek ludów / Golden Age – Czarnówko during the Roman Period and the Migration Period, [w:] J. Andrzejowski, J. Schuster (red.), Okruch złota w popiele ogniska... Starożytne nekropole w Czarnówku i ich tajemnice / A Fleck od Gold in the Ashes... Mysteries of the Prehistoric Cemeteries at Czarnówko, Monumenta Archaeologica Barbarica. Series Popularis I, Lębork-Warszawa, 53–90.
SCHUSTER J. 2018: Czarnówko, stan. 5. Osiem grobów okazałych – narodziny nowych elit w II wieku po Chr. w basenie Morza Bałtyckiego, Czarnówko, stan. 5, Cmentarzyska z późnej starożytności na Pomorzu 2 = Monumenta Archaeologica Barbarica. Series Gemina VIII, Lębork-Warszawa.
SKOWRON J. 2010: Forma odlewnicza z osady w Rawie Mazowieckiej, stan. 3, woj. łódzkie – kilka słów o użytkowaniu ołowiu w kulturze przeworskiej, [w:] A. Urbaniak et alii (red.), TERRA BARBARICA. Studia ofiarowane Magdalenie Mączyńskiej w 65. rocznicę urodzin, Monumenta Archaeologica Barbarica. Series Gemina II, Łódź-Warszawa, 785–789.
SPROCKHOFF E. 1956: Jungbronzezeitliche Hortfunde der Südzone des nordischen Kreises (Periode V). Band II, Kataloge des Römisch-Germanischen Zentralmuseums 16/2, Mainz.
STAWICKI S. 1987: Papirusy tebańskie. Antyczne źródło wiedzy o technikach artystycznych, Wrocław.
STROBIN A. 2019: Bronze Tripartite Belt Hooks from Pomerania as Proof of Cultural Connections in the Late Pre-Roman and Roman Period, „Wiadomości Archeologiczne” LXX, 3–42.
STROBIN J. 2000: Modelowanie w kształtownikach – uwagi na temat technik kucia w metaloplastyce kultury wielbarskiej, „Światowit” II (XLIII), fasc. B, 231–252.
STROBIN J. 2013: Technologia zabytków metalowych, [w:] J. Szałkowska-Łoś, J. Łoś, Zakrzewska Osada. Cmentarzyska kultury pomorskiej i wielbarskiej na Pojezierzu Krajeńskim, Ocalone Dziedzictwo Archeologiczne 2, Bydgoszcz-Pękowice, 121–127.
STROBIN J. 2015: Okucie typu balteus jako przykład technik zdobniczych w złotnictwie barbarzyńskim młodszego okresu rzymskiego, [w:] M. Kurzyńska, Linowo, stanowisko 6, birytualne cmentarzysko kultury wielbarskiej z północno- -wschodniej części ziemi chełmińskiej, Grudziądz-Toruń, 177–190.
STUPPERICH R. 2006: Zerhacktes Silber – Beuteteilung unter den Germanen, [w:] J. Stadler (red.), Der Barbarenschatz. Geraubt und im Rhein versunken, Speyer, 210–218.
SZTUKA ZŁOTNICZA... 1962: Sztuka złotnicza starożytnej Italii. Katalog wystawy przesłanej przez rząd Republiki Włoskiej w stulecie Muzeum Narodowego w Warszawie 1862–1962, Warszawa maj–czerwiec 1962 (red. S. Finocchi, S. Kozakiewicz), Warszawa.
TREISTER M.Y. 2001: Hammering Techniques in Greek and Roman Jewellery and Toreutics, Colloquia Pontica 8, Leiden.
TRESOR... 1989: Trésor d’orfèvrerie gallo-romains, Paris.
TUSZYŃSKA M., STROBIN A., STROBIN J. 2016: Rzemieślnicy czy artyści? Ozdoby kobiece z Pomorza u schyłku starożytności. Katalog skrócony wystawy, Gdańsk.
UNTRACHT O. 1985: Jewelry. Concepts and technology, New York.
VOß H.-U. 1999: Bemerkungen zur Materialversorgung und -verwendung germanischer Feinschmiede, [w:] H-U. Voß, P. Hammer, J. Lutz (red.), Römische und germanische Bunt- und Edelmetallfunde im Vergleich. Archäometallurgische Untersuchungen ausgehend von elbgermanischen Körpergräbern, Bericht der Römisch-Germanischen Kommission 79 (1998), 290–291.
WERNER J. 1970: Zur Verbreitung frühgeschichtlicher Metallarbeiten (Werkstatt – Wanderhandwerk – Handel – Familienbindung), Early Medieval Studies 1 = „Antikvariskt arkiv” 38, 65–81.
WICKER N.L. 1994: The Organization of Crafts Production and the Social Status of the Migration Period Goldsmith, [w:] P.O. Nielsen, K. Randsborg, H. Thrane (red.), The Archaeology of Gudme and Lundeborg. Papers presented at Conference at Svenborg, October 1991, Arkæologiske Studier X, København (1993), 145–150.
WIEGELS R. 2003: Silberbarren der römischen Kaiserzeit. Katalog und Versuch einer Deutung, Freiburger Beiträge zur Archäologie und Geschichte des ersten Jahrtausends 7, Rahden/Westf.
WIELOWIEJSKI J. 1960: Przemiany gospodarcze i społeczne u ludności południowej Polski w okresie późnolateńskim i rzymskim, „Materiały Starożytne” VI, 7–426.
WIELOWIEJSKI J. 1969: Wpływ reform monetarnych w latach 63–215 na przyjmowanie srebrnych pieniędzy rzymskich przez ludy północne, „Wiadomości Numizmatyczne” XIII/1, 1–18.
WILLERS H. 1898: Römische Silberbarren mit Stempel, „Numismatische Zeitschrift” XXX, 211–235.
WOLTERS J. 1984: Der Gold- und Silberschmied, Bd. 1: Werkstoffe und Materialien, Stuttgart.
WÓJCIK T. 1982: Pomorskie formy bransolet wężowatych z okresu rzymskiego, „Materiały Zachodniopomorskie” XXIV (1978), 35–113.
YEROULANOU A. 1999: Diatrita. Gold pierced-work jewellery from the 3rd to the 7th century, Athens.
ZASTAWNIAK F. 1995: Złotnictwo i probiernictwo, Kraków.
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top