PL EN
DISCOVERIES
A Neolithic Anthropomorphic Stone Figurine from Tupadły, site 1, Inowrocław County
 
More details
Hide details
1
Instytut Archeologii UR w Rzeszowie
 
2
„Testa” Pracownia Archeologiczna, ul. Gorkiego 37, 92-524 Łódź
 
 
Publication date: 2015-12-31
 
 
Wiadomości Archeologiczne 2015;LXVI(66):313-317
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
The anthropomorphic stone figurine was discovered at Tupadły 1 in Kujawy (Fig. 1, 2), during a rescue excavation made in w 2014, directed by Andrzej Wójcik. The material of the figurine is an amphibolite pebble, presumably from a postglacial deposit. The local origin of its lithic resource suggests tha t the figurine was manufactured in the region. The figurine was discovered outside an archaeological feature, within the subsoil stratum. This prevents a closer determination of its chronology and culture attribution. Basing on indirect evidence, its similarity to figurines recorded elsewhere in Europe and their dating, and the broader context of the early Neolithic settlement in the region of present day Inowrocław, the figurine’s chronology may be assigned generally to the 5th millennium BC and attributed to the settlement of late Banded Pottery culture groups. If this proposal is accepted, this would be the first anthropomorphic stone statuette from Poland dating to the early Neolithic. Similar images are observed in the art dating to the 5th millennium recorded across much of Europe to the south and the south-east of the Carpathians. It is in this region, and in different cultural environments, that we need to seek the source of inspiration of the maker of the artefact from Tupadły. The exact location or even the region of origin cannot be specified. In any case, the figurine from Tupadły must be taken into account when studying the network of contacts and the information flow covering much of Europe in the 5th millennium BC.
 
REFERENCES (9)
1.
Andreescu, R.-R., The sign: typology, context meaning, [w:] S. A. Luca (red.), Signs and symbols from Danube Neolithic and Eneolithic, Bibliotheca Brukenthal 35, Sibiu, 2009, s. 77–85.
 
2.
Angeleski, S., The Early and Middle Neolithic in Macedonia. Links with the neighbouring areas, B.A.R. Int. Series 2332, Oxford, 2012.
 
3.
Balkan-Atli, N., La Néolithisation de l’Anatolie, Varia Anatolica 7, Paris, 1994.
 
4.
Bánffy, E., A unique prehistoric figurine of the Near East. A case study, Archaeolingua. Series Minor 15, Budapest, 2001.
 
5.
Becker, V., Early and middle Neolithic figurines – the migration of religious belief, Documenta Praehistorica XXXIV (14th Neolithic Studies), 2007, s. 119–127.
 
6.
Bodean, S., Aşezările culturii Precucuteni-Tripolie A din republica Moldova, Chişinău, 2001.
 
7.
Cauvin, J., Les premiers villages de Syrie-Palestine du IXe au VIIe millénaire avant J.-C., Collection de la Maison de l’Orient Méditerranéen Ancien 4. Série archéologique 3, Lyon, 1978.
 
8.
Czerniak, L., Rozwój społeczeństw kultury późnej ceramiki wstęgowej na Kujawach, Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu. Seria Archeologia 16, Poznań, 1980.
 
9.
Czerniak, L., Wczesny i środkowy okres neolitu na Kujawach, 5400–3650 p.n.e., Poznań, 1994.
 
ISSN:0043-5082
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top