Socketed Axes with Facetted Sides from the Middle Vistula Basin
More details
Hide details
Państwowe Muzeum Archeologiczne w Warszawie, ul. Długa 52 «Arsenał», PL 00-241 Warszawa
Submission date: 2020-06-02
Final revision date: 2020-06-28
Acceptance date: 2020-07-17
Publication date: 2020-12-31
Wiadomości Archeologiczne 2020;LXXI(71):189–216
The article discusses six characteristic bronze axes whose sides are covered with six symmetrically-arranged arcuate planes. Two axes – from Gole, Grodzisk Maz. County (Fig. 2:b, 3:b), and Rogowo, Toruń County (Fig. 16), come from hoards, the others – from Drohiczyn, Siemia­tycze County (Fig. 11, 12:a), Masłomęcz, Hrubieszów County (Fig. 12:b), Pobyłkowo, Pułtusk County (Fig. 13–15), and Wilamowice, Płońsk County (Fig. 8, 9), were stray finds. In Gole, in addition to the facetted axe, a second socketed axe of a different type was also found (Fig. 2:a, 3:a). The axes in question, except for the assemblage from Gole, have already been published, with divergent views presented on their provenance. The axes from Gole and Wilamowice were cast from tin bronzes of varying composition (Table 1). They were cast utilising reusable cores, almost cylindrical in shape in the case of Gole, axe no. 1 (Fig. 5:a), and conical in the case of facetted axes from Gole, Wilamowice and Masłomęcz (Fig. 5:b.c). The axes are usually carefully finished (Fig. 4:c–f, 7, 10:a.e); only the specimen from Pobyłkowo presented an unremoved fragment of a sprue on the edge of the socket. Certain use-wear was observed on two specimens only – from Wilamowice and Masłomęcz (Fig. 8, 9, 10:g–i, 12:b). J. Kostrzewski (1964, 20, 32, 54, map VII) associated the axes from Drohiczyn and Pobyłkowo with the Eastern Balt circle and dated them to the Early Iron Age. J. Kuśnierz (1998, 84–85) considered them (as well as the specimens from Wilamowice and Rogowo) to be similar to Balt forms of the Littausdorf type and attributed them to Bronze Age V. J. Dąbrowski (1997, 500) deemed that they are related to Lusatian Culture axes (without specifying their chronology). According to him (J. Dabrowski 197, 48), the specimen from Wilamowice, representing the first variant of the so-called Lusatian axes from Bronze Age IV and V, is an import from the south. Due to its general formal similarity, the axe from Masłomęcz is linked with the ‘Lusatian’ types of Kowalewko and Wielichowo, and due to its facetted sides, with the Balt metallurgical centre (M.E. Kłosińska 2006, 310). Facetted axes do not form a uniform group. The four larger specimens, measuring from 13.4 to 13.9 cm in length (Fig. 2:b, 3:b, 8, 9, 14–16), differ in shape and convexity of the cutting edge. All four axes have a vertical midrib, thickened, elevated side edges, longitudinal recesses located on both sides of the midrib, and a prominent, biconical moulding around the edge of the socket, which can be round (Fig. 14) or almost quadrilateral (Fig. 3:b, 9, 10:f). The smaller axes, about 11.0 cm long and with spade-like blades (Fig. 12), differ from each other in a number of details. The specimen from Drohiczyn (Fig. 12:a), with a cylindrical ridge around the mouth of the socket round in cross-section, topped with a vertical collar, has a vertical rib and prominent side edges (Fig. 11, 12:a) like the large facetted axes. On the faces of the Masłomęcz axe, there are wide, curved recesses, separated by a Y-shaped ridge; the ridge of the quadrilateral socket is strongly thickened (Fig. 12:b). In terms of formal features, facetted axes correspond to the oldest socketed axes of the Lusatian Culture. Such specimens, classified as the Kowalewko (length of 12–15 cm) and Wielichowo (length of 9.0 cm on average) types according to J. Kuśnierz (1998, 28, 31), were manufactured at the end of Bronze Age IV at the so-called Oder metallurgical centre. Facetted axes form a peculiar group of objects, characterised by strongly defined midribs and edges, and sometimes also by decorations on the faces (Fig. 2:b, 3:b, 8, 9, 16). According to information provided by the finder, the place where the axes from Gole were discovered is located within the former riverbed of the Pisia Tuczna River, currently not visible in the terrain (Fig. 1). Axe 1 from this assemblage represents forms of Middle Danube origin, with a straight socket mouth of variant B in J. Kuśnierz’s classification, dating north of the Carpathians from HaA1 to the late Bronze Age (J. Kuśnierz 1998, 15–16; J. Orlicka-Jasnoch 2019, 29–30). Most of the formal features of axe 2 (Fig. 2:a, 3:a) are consistent with the Kowalewko type of variant B (J. Kuśnierz 1998, 28), according to the definition – ‘with one rib’ in the middle and bent, thickened edges (axes ‘with several ribs’ are characterised by the presence of short, vertical ridges). It differs thanks to its slenderness, strongly expanded and convex blade and multi-layered ornamentation consisting of incisions, grooves and stamped points (Fig. 6). In proportions, it resembles the forms of the Nordic Culture: flanged axes or palstaves with a socket at the top (Rand- und »Absatzbeile« mit oberständiger Tülle in the classification of E. Aner [1962, 173–178, fig. 4:2.3]) from Bronze Age II, and similarly dated battle/ceremonial palstaves (nordische Streitbeile/Prachtbeile of type B after A. Oldeberg [1974, e.g. no. 194, 255, 406; 1976, 3]), especially the socketed forms (nach Art »nordischer Streitbeile« by E. Aner [1962, 180–186, fig. 6:1.2, 7:2b, 8:2b]) from the younger stage of Bronze Age II, which were often additionally decorated. The motif of three engraved, nested angles, located on the upper part of the Gole axe, occurs quite often at the base of the blade of nordischer Streitbeile, which were sometimes also ornamented with incisions and stamped points (e.g. K. Kersten 1958, pl. 21:270.272, 29:332). The assemblage from Gole, as well as the treasures from Pławowice, Proszowice County and Podłęże, Wieliczka County, also consisting of axes of Middle Danube origin with a straight socket mouth of variant B and local specimens of the Kowalewko type, falls within HaB1, i.e. the final stage of Bronze Age IV (cf. W. Blajer 2013, 31–32). The hoard from Rogowo is dated to HaB1 – apart from the facetted specimen with features of the Kowalewko type of variant B, adorned with three nested V-shaped ribs on the midrib and a knob below the socket mouth (Fig. 16) – consists of a hexagonal axe (Wesseling form) of Nordic provenance and a spearhead with a ribbed blade that has analogies in the Carpathian Basin (W. Blajer 2013, 36–37, 48, 152–153, pl. 76:4–6). Analogies to the Rogowo axe, apart from the almost identical specimen from Wilamowice (Fig. 8, 9, 10:b.c), can be found in five specimens decorated with V-shaped ribs, but with smooth lateral sides, from the hoard from Nowa Górna, Warszawa West County (unpubl., collections of the State Archaeological Museum in Warsaw and the City Museum of Zgierz). Significant similarity between specimens from Rogowo and Wila­mowice (Fig. 8, 9, 16) indicates that they were made at a similar time. The repetitiveness of axes decorated with V-shaped ribs and their concentration in a relatively small area near the Vistula River (Fig. 17) allows considering them as objects of local provenance, which may have come from workshops operating outside the Oder metallurgical centre; so far, no axes decorated with arcuate facets and V-shaped ribs are known from the western part of the area covered by the Lusatian Culture settlement. The axe from Pobyłkowo (Fig. 15) resembles the smaller specimen from Drohiczyn in proportions and placement of the loop (Fig. 12:a). Similar, slightly lowered loop placement is rarely encountered in the examples of the Kowalewko type; it is more common in the Wielichowo type forms (cf. J. Kuśnierz 1998, pl. 8:117.127, 9:132.137.141, 10:149.151–154.156). The axes from Drohiczyn and Masłomęcz (Fig. 12) correspond in length (11.0 cm) to some of the largest specimens of the Wielichowo type. The axe from Drohiczyn (Fig. 12:a), similar to the large facetted specimens, represents a form with one rib and prominent lateral edges. Socket mouths as the one in the Drohiczyn example – cylindrical with a low vertical collar – can be found in the Czarków and Kotowo type axes, occurring mainly in Bronze Age V (cf. W. Blajer 2013, 35–36). The Masłomęcz specimen differs from other facetted axes in deep, curved recesses separated with a Y-shaped ridge, and non-thickened edges (Fig. 12:b). Such recesses were commonly placed on the blades of norddeutcher Arbeitsbeile of the Oldeberg A group, i.e. palstaves of the Kappeln type, occurring in the Nordic zone, especially from the second half of Bronze Age II to the beginning of Bronze Age III (e.g. K. Kibbert 1980, 212, pl. 32:483–485, 33, 34). They were to play a significant role in the development, already in the second half of Bronze Age II, of socketed looped axes nach Art »norddeutscher Arbeitsbeile«, which possessed analogous indentations (E. Aner 1962, 187–200, e.g. fig. 9, 10:1–3a, 12). The arrangement of recesses and the vertical ridge that separates them, found on the above mentioned Nordic axes, corresponds to the arrangement of indentations and the single vertical rib on early Lusatian axes, including facetted examples (Fig. 2:b, 3:b, 8, 9, 11, 12:a, 13–16). Thus, if the vertical rib is considered to be what remains of a stop-ridge formed on flanged axes and palstaves (cf. E. Sprockhoff 1956a, 87), then the recesses may serve as a model for the concavities on specimens of the Kowalewko and Wielichowo types. The edges, although not thickened in palstaves (and the Masłomęcz axe), were in fact emphasised by the adjoining recesses; in the literature they are described as pseudo-flanges or strongly defined edges (E. Sprockhoff 1950, 95; M. Kaczmarek 2012, 198). On axes of the Lusatian Culture, where the recesses were shallower than on the earlier forms, the edges were emphasised by thickening them. Therefore, it seems likely that the idea of placing one rib on the Lusatian Culture axes may originate in the tradition of the Nordic cultural circle. As local bronze manufacturing developed, axes with one rib were supplanted as early as Bronze Age V by the most numerous local types of Czarków and Przedmieście with several vertical ribs, which were easier to make and reproduce. This theory seems to explain the diversity of the early Lusatian Culture axes, which has already been highlighted many times in the literature (e.g. E. Sprockhoff 1950, 93; E. Baudou 1960, 25). The practice of covering the sides of axes with arcuate facets also originates from the Nordic cultural circle. Flanged axes and axes of Kappeln type were already adorned in this manner (see e.g. A. Olde­berg 1974, no. 93, 624a, 738, 939), as well as socketed axes nach Art »norddeutscher Arbeitsbeile« (e.g. E. Aner 1962, fig. 9, 10:2.3a, 13:2a), to which the Masłomęcz specimen bears a resemblance in the shape of its faces. The demonstrated connections to the Nordic cultural circle seem to confirm the distribution of finds of facetted axes along the final section of a route which, from the Early Bronze Age to the Hallstatt Period, ran from north-western Europe along the Lower and Middle Oder, further along the Warta River through the Gniezno Lakeland to Kuyavia, then along the Vistula and Bug River to the south (Fig. 17; cf. J. Żychlińska 2008, 156; J. Affelski 2011, 165). Before the assemblages from Gole and Nowa Górna (the locations of both hoards, provided by the finders and fully corresponding to the distribution of facetted axes, are considered reliable) were discovered, there had been no known hoards from the end of Bronze Age IV from the area of Mazovia, Kuyavia and central and south-eastern Poland. New finds from the area of western Mazovia shed new light on the distribution of hoards in Poland at the end of the 11th and beginning of the 10th century BCE.
AFFELSKI J. 2011: Dwie brązowe siekierki z okolic Pułtuska, „Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Archaeologica” 28, 161–166.
Andrzejowska M. 2020: Halsztackie ozdoby brązowe z Warszawy-Wilanowa, „Wiadomości Archeologiczne” LXXI, 217–237.
ANER E. 1962: Die frühen Tüllenbeile des nordischen Kreises, „Acta Archaeologica” XXXIII/2–3, 165–219.
BAUDOU E. 1960: Die regionale und chronologische Einteilung der jüngeren Bronzezeit im Nordischen Kreis, Acta Universitatis Stockholmiensis. Studies in North-European Archaeology 1, Stockholm-Göteborg-Uppsala.
BĄBEL J. 1998: Topór. Ciągłość idei. Wystawa Państwowego Muzeum Archeologicznego w 70-tą rocznicę ustanowienia, Warszawa.
BEYER K. 1856: Album de l’exposition des objets d’art et d’antiquitè, Varsovie.
BIBORSKI M. 2018: Conservation and technological-chemical analyses of metal artefacts from the bronze hoard from Jabłonka, RArch. NS 9 (2017), 313–317.
BLAJER W. 1999: Skarby ze starszej i środkowej epoki brązu na ziemiach polskich, Prace Komisji Archeologicznej 30, Kraków.
BLAJER W. 2001: Skarby przedmiotów metalowych z epoki brązu i wczesnej epoki żelaza na ziemiach polskich, Kraków.
BLAJER W. 2013: Młodsza epoka brązu na ziemiach polskich w świetle badań nad skarbami, Kraków.
BLAJER W. 2015: Brązowa siekierka z tulejką z Kąclowej, pow. nowosądecki, „Materiały Archeologiczne” XL, 161–168.
BLAJER W. 2018: Bronze hoard from Jabłonka, Głubczyce District, „Recherches Archéologiques NS” 9 (2017), 289–312.
BOROFFKA N. ET ALII 2016: N. Boroffka, B. Nessel, M. Prange, H. Ciugudean, M. Takács, Neues Licht auf alte Fragen – Einige besondere Metallobjekte aus dem Depotfund von Aiud, Kreis Alba, Rumänien, [w:] M. Bartelheim, B. Horejs, R. Krauß (red.), Von Baden bis Troia. Ressourcennutzung, Metallurgie und Wissenstransfer. Eine Jubiläumsschrift für Ernst Pernicka, Oriental and European Archaeology 3, Rahden/Westf. 339–421.
VON BRUNN W.A. 1968a: Mitteldeutsche Hortfunde der jüngeren Bronzezeit. Text, Römisch-Germanische Forschungen 29, Berlin.
VON BRUNN W.A. 1968b: Mitteldeutsche Hortfunde der jüngeren Bronzezeit. Tafeln, Römisch-Germanische Forschungen 29, Berlin.
BUGOI R. ET ALII 2013: R. Bugoi, B. Constantinescu, A.D. Popescu, F. Munnik, Archaeometallurgical studies of bronze age objects from the Romanian cultural heritage, „Romanian Reports in Physics” 65/4, 1234–1245.
BUKOWSKI Z. 1998: Pomorze w epoce brązu w świetle dalekosiężnych kontaktów wymiennych, Gdańsk.
CZEBRESZUK J., KRYVALCEVIČ M. 2012: Miedziana siekiera z miejscowości Azierszczyna, rejon Rieczyca, obwód Homel, na Białorusi. Z badań nad początkami metalurgii nad górnym Dnieprem, FAP 48, 221–236.
DĄBROWSKI J. 1968: Zabytki metalowe epoki brązu między dolną Wisłą a Niemnem, Wrocław.
DĄBROWSKI J. 1982: Metalurgia epoki brązu w północno-wschodniej Polsce, [w:] Pamiętnik Muzeum Miedzi, tom I (red. Z. Bukowski), Legnica, 231–242.
DĄBROWSKI J. 1997: Epoka brązu w północno-wschodniej Polsce, Białystok.
DIETRICH O. 2010: Tüllenbeile in Rumänien. Zu einigen grundlegenden Fragen von Fundüberlieferung, Chorologie und Chronologie, „Mitteilungen der Berliner Gesellschaft für Anthropologie, Ethnologie und Urgeschichte” 31, 27–40.
DRZEWICZ A. 2003: Dwa czekany typu Nortycken z Czubina ze zbiorów Państwowego Muzeum Archeologicznego w Warszawie, WA LVI (2002–2003), 63–68.
ENGEL C. 1935: Vorgeschichte der altpreußischen Stämme. Untersuchungen über Siedlungstätigkeit und Kulturgruppen im vorgeschichtlichen Ostpreußen, tom I, Königsberg Pr.
GARBACZ-KLEMPKA A., ŚCIBIOR D., KWAK Z. 2016: Badania i wizualizacja technologii odlewniczej w epoce brązu na podstawie ceramicznych i kamiennych form z Legnicy z ul. Spokojnej, [w:] K. Nowak, T. Stolarczyk (red.), Metalurdzy znad Kaczawy. Cmentarzysko ciałopalne z epoki brązu odkryte w Legnicy przy ul. Spokojnej, Legnica, 109–128.
GŁOSIK J. 2001: Katalog materiałów Pogotowia Archeologicznego za lata 1982–1991, WA LV (1999–2001), 219–243.
HENSEL Z. 1996: Produkcja wyrobów ze stopów miedzi na Kujawach w świetle badań chemicznych, [w:] A. Cofta-Broniewska (red.) Metalurgia brązu pradziejowych społeczeństw Kujaw, Studia i Materiały do Dziejów Kujaw 7, Poznań, 129–190.
KACZMAREK M. 2002: Zachodniowielkopolskie społeczności kultury łużyckiej w epoce brązu, Wrocław.
KACZMAREK M. 2012: Epoka brązu na Nizinie Wielkopolsko-Kujawskiej w świetle interregionalnych kontaktów wymiennych, Poznań.
KERSTEN K. 1958: Die Funde der älteren Bronzezeit in Pommern, Beiheft zum Atlas der Urgeschichte 7, Hamburg.
KŁOSIŃSKA E.M. 2006: Nowe znaleziska brązowych siekier z tuleją z Lubelszczyzny, „Archeologia Polski Środkowowschodniej” VIII, 307–316.
KOSTRZEWSKI J. 1964: Skarby i luźne znaleziska metalowe od eneolitu do wczesnego okresu żelaza z górnego i środkowego dorzecza Wisły i górnego dorzecza Warty, „Przegląd Archeologiczny” XV, 5–133.
KROKOSZ J. 2008: Studium archeometalurgii i technik odlewniczych z epoki brązu (940–750 lat p.n.e.) w świetle badań materiałoznawczych i technologicznych odlewanej siekierki, Kraków, mps dysertacji doktorskiej w Akademii Górniczo-Hutniczej w Krakowie (; dostęp: 17.11.2019).
KUŚNIERZ J. 1998: Die Beile in Polen III (Tüllenbeile), Prähistorische Bronzefunde IX/21, Stuttgart.
LANG V., KRIISKA A., HAAK A. 2006: A new Early Bronze Age socketed axe, „Estonian Journal of Archaeology” 10/1, 81–88.
LIS V. 1988: Materiały z cmentarzyska kultury łużyckiej w Grodzisku Mazowieckim, woj. warszawskie, „Wiadomości Archelogiczne” XLIX/1 (1984–1988), 101–108.
ŁUKA L.J. 1982: Metalurgia brązu w kulturze wschodniopomorskiej, [w:] Pamiętnik Muzeum Miedzi, tom 1 (red. Z. Bukowski), Legnica, 209–224.
MACHAJEWSKI H., MACIEJEWSKI M. 2006: Skarb ludności kultury łużyckiej z Roska nad Notecią, [w:] H. Machajewski, J. Rola (red.), Pradolina Noteci na tle pradziejowych i wczesnośredniowiecznych szlaków handlowych, Poznań, 127–146.
MAKAROWICZ P., GARBACZ-KLEMPKA A. 2014: Osada metalurgów w Szczepidle nad środkową Wartą. Z badań nad wytwórczością z brązu w II tys. BC, „Fontes Archaeologici Posnanienses” 50/2, 261–281.
MOGIELNICKA-URBAN M. 1997: Uwagi w sprawie interpretacji zbiorowych i pojedynczych znalezisk przedmiotów brązowych, [w:] W. Blajer (red.), Beiträge zur Deutung der Bronzezeitlichen Hort- und Grabfunde in Mitteleuropa, Materialien der archäologischen Konferenz „Bronzen und Menschen an der Schwelle der Urnenfelderzeit im östlichen Mitteleuropa“ Kraków, 05-08.1996, Kraków, 17–32.
MÖDLINGER M. 2010: Zur Dokumentation bronzezeitlicher Waffen und Werkzeuge aus dem ehemaligen Ostpreußen, „Acta Praehistorica et Archaeologica” 42, 109–153.
MOZSOLICS A. 1985: Bronzefunde aus Ungarn. Depotfundhorizonte von Aranyos, Kurd und Gyermely, Budapest.
NOVOTNÁ M. 1970: Die Äxte und Beile in der Slowakei, Prähistorische Bronzefunde IX/3, München.
NOWAK K. 2018: Badania nad rekonstrukcją sposobów wytwarzania wybranych typów narzędzi metalowych w późnej epoce brązu. Dwuczęściowe gliniane formy odlewnicze, „Śląskie Sprawozdania Archeologiczne” 60/2, 97–124.
OLDEBERG A. 1974: Die ältere Metallzeit in Schweden I, Stockholm.
OLDEBERG A. 1976: Die ältere Metallzeit in Schweden II, Stockholm.
ORLICKA-JASNOCH J. 2019: Skarb ludności kultury łużyckiej z Nowego Kramska. Aspekt archeologiczny, [w:] A. Michalak, J. Orlicka-Jasnoch (red.), Skarb z Nowego Kramska. Analizy. Konteksty, Zielona Góra, 17–138.
PERNICKA E. 2014: Provenance Determination of Archaeological Metal Objects, [w:] B.W. Roberts, C.P. Thornton (red.), Archaeometallurgy in Global Perspective, New York, 239–268.
PODCZASZYŃSKI B. 1856: (red.) Katalog Wystawy Starożytności i Przedmiotów Sztuki 1856 urządzonéj w pałacu JW. hr. Augustostwa Potockich w Warszawie na Krakowskiem-Przedmieściu, na korzyść Domu Schronienia Opieki Najświętszej Maryi Panny, Warszawa.
PODCZASZYŃSKI B. 1857: Przegląd historyczny starożytności krajowych z powodu wystawy urządzonéj w Warszawie w r. 1856. w pałacu JW. Hr. Aug. Potockich, Warszawa.
SPROCKHOFF E. 1931: Die germanische Griffzungenchwerter, Berlin-Leipzig.
SPROCKHOFF E. 1950: Das LausitzerTüllenbeil, „Praehistorische Zeitschrift“ XXXIV/V-1 (1949–1950), 76–31.
SPROCKHOFF E. 1956a: Jungbronzezeitliche Hortfunde der Südzone des nordischen Kreises (Periode V). Band I, Kataloge des Römisch-Germanischen Zentralmuseums 16/1, Mainz.
SPROCKHOFF E. 1956b: Jungbronzezeitliche Hortfunde der Südzone des nordischen Kreises (Periode V). Band II, Kataloge des Römisch-Germanischen Zentralmuseums 16/2, Mainz.
SZMONIEWSKI B.S. 2009: Cementacja mosiądzu w starożytności i w średniowieczu – zarys zagadnienia, [w:] D. Rozmus, S. Witkowski (red.), Gospodarka nad Przemszą i Brynicą od pradziejów do początków XX wieku w świetle badań interdyscyplinarnych, Dąbrowa Górnicza-Olkusz-Sosnowiec, 118–121.
SZPUNAR A. 1987: Die Beile in Polen I (Flachbeile, Randleistenbeile, Randleistenmeißel), Prähistorische Bronzefunde IX/16, München.
SZPUNAR A. 2008: Siekiery typu Kappeln w Polsce, [w:] M. Mogielnicka-Urban (red.), Opera ex aere. Studia z epoki brązu i wczesnej epoki żelaza dedykowane profesorowi Janowi Dąbrowskiemu, Warszawa, 79–89.
ŠTURMS E. 1936: Die ältere Bronzezeit im Ostbaltikum, Vorgeschichtliche Forschungen 10, Berlin-Leipzig.
ŠTURMS E. 1938: Die Entstehung einer ostbaltischen Tüllenbeilform, [w:] H. Bauer, W. Neugebauer, W. Radig (red.), Festschrift Bruno Ehrlich zum 70. Geburtstag dargebracht, „Elbinger Jahrbuch” 15, 54–56.
TREBSCHE P.  2002: Ein Tüllenbeil mit Holzschäftung und weitere urnenfelderzeitliche Funde aus Enns, „Archäologie Österreichs” 13/1, 40–50.
UZAROWICZOWA A. 1962: Cmentarzysko łużyckie w Szwarocinie pow. Sochaczew, „Wiadomości Archeologiczne“ XXVIII/4, 359–390.
WAGNER T. 2014: Eine jungbronzezeitliche Siedlungskammer bei Haldensleben (Lkr. Börde, Sachsen-Anhalt) – Fundplätze an der südlichen Peripherie des Nordischen Bronzekreises, [w:] B. Nessel, I. Heske, D. Brandherm (red.), Ressourcen und Rohstoffe in der Bronzezeit. Nutzung – Distribution – Kontrolle. Beiträge zur Sitzung der Arbeitsgemeinschaft Bronzezeit auf der Jahrestagung des Mittel- und Ostdeutschen Verbandes für Altertumsforschung in Brandenburg an der Havel, 16. bis 17. April 2012, Arbeitsberichte zur Bodendenkmalpflege in Brandenburg 26, Wünsdorf, 147–156.
WĘGRZYNOWICZ T. 1973: Kultura łużycka na Mazowszu wschodnim i Podlasiu, „Materiały Starożynte i Wczesnośredniowieczne” II, 7–125.
ŻUKOWSKA-UZAROWICZOWA A. 1962: Cmentarzysko łużyckie w Erminowie, pow. Sochaczew, „Wiadomości Archeologiczne” XXVIII/1, 59–69.
ŻYCHLIŃSKA J. 2008: Recepcja „importu” nordyjskiego na ziemiach polskich we wczesnych fazach kultury łużyckiej, Poznań.