PL EN
PAPERS
Brides for the afterlife? Some considerations on female burials from West Lithuania in the third century AD
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Archaeology, Lithuanian Institute of History/Lietuvos istorijos institutas, Lithuania
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Rasa Banytė-Rowell   

Department of Archaeology, Lithuanian Institute of History/Lietuvos istorijos institutas, Tilto g. 17, 11351, Vilnius, Lithuania
Submission date: 2022-02-22
Final revision date: 2022-03-18
Acceptance date: 2022-07-21
Online publication date: 2022-10-03
 
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT

The article is devoted to the female costume of graves in West Lithuania (area of cemeteries with stone-enclosures, the northern part of so called Memelkultur acc. C. Engel), which belongs to the third cent. AD (interregional phases C1b-C2, ca 220-300AD)(Fig. 1). Particular attention is drawn to two burials from Šernai (DE – Schernen) cemetery in Klaipėda rajonas which was excavated by A. Bezzenberger in 1891 (published by him in 1892). The skeletal remains of Šernai graves 10 and 22 were described by Bezzenberger as belonging to individuals of child age which may be connected with category of infans II (7-14,9 years) (see footnote 90). These two burials are widely known foremost because of the splendid headdress decorated with tiny bronze details – studs with two legs (Group III D of Bronzebuckelchen acc. Blumbergs 1982) and bronze flat spirals-pendants (Fig. 2). Both Šernai graves contained a rich set of ornaments – neckrings, crossbow brooches, rosette tutulus pins or tutulus brooch, strings of beads with iron bell-shaped pendants, spiral bracelets of Klaipėda type acc. Michelbertas and sash-like bracelets, finger rings (Figs 3-7). The similar female burials were unearthed in the neighbourhood to Šernai Cemetery on the same left bank of Minija river, some four kilometres to the North-East – in Baitai Cemetery (now Baičiai, Klaipėda rajonas, DE – Baiten). The part of a female‘s outfit from Baitai Grave 18 also was a headdress (headband or front part of the hood) decorated with the same type elements like in Šernai graves 10 and 22 (Fig. 8). The set of jewellry was similar despite being less numerous: a silver neckring, a pair of rosette tutulus pins linked with a chain, glass and amber beads, spiral bracelet of Klaipėda type, bronze finger rings (Figs 9-12). The remains of teeth belonging to the deceased from Baitai Grave 18 were examined by Associate Professor Ž. Miliauskienė and it was concluded that they belong to an individual of adolescent age between 15 and 19 years of category juvenis (15-19,9 years). The female from Baitai Grave 8 contained no remains of splendid headdress but she was provided with a set of ornaments similar to the burials discussed above: two rosette tutulus pins linked with string of glass and amber beads and iron bell-shaped pendants, two bronze bracelets with slightly thickened terminals, three bronze finger rings (one with blue glass inlay) (Fig. 13). The anthropological investigation of finger bones preserved in Baitai Grave 8 allowed us to conclude that the burial belonged to a child under the age of 16 (this investigation was performed by Dr J. Kozakaitė). The deceased belongs to the age category of infans II (7-14,9 years) or to the transitional age towards category of juvenis (15-19,9 years).

It seems that a headdress with bronze decoration, tutulus-shaped ornaments, strings of beads and iron bell-shaped pendants, spiral bracelets of Klaipėda type and sash-like bracelets with a concave cross-section were elements of a ‘uniform’ for the burials of girls and young females. The grave-set from Lazdininkai Grave 23 (1996) has such components and according to anthropological investigations this burial belonged to to an adultus individual of 20-30 years. Another female burial from Lazdininkai Grave 63 (2000) contained the remains of a headdress decorated with bronze details. The deceased belonged to the category of age juvenis/adultus (age of 15-25 years) (Bliujienė, Bračiulienė 2018, Table 25). It is noticeable that the remains of a headdress or other dress decorated with bronze details of Group III D of Bronzebuckelchen acc. Blumbergs and flat spiral pendants were also found in other burials in Šernai (graves 54, 67) and Baitai (graves 2, 24) cemeteries. Šernai Grave 54 was attributed to a ‘grown up child’ and recent anthropological investigations of teeth from Baitai Grave 2 proved that they belonged to the individual of age ca 18-25 years old. Thus, it seems that age of females provided with headdress vary between category of infans II and early adultus.

All the burials discussed here were richly equipped with jewellery. Nevertheless, they were not exeptional in the context of the mid-third century – second half of third century in West Lithuania. Similar headdresses occured in other cemeteries of Memelkultur (such like Kurmaičiai, Dauglaukis, Tilsit). Tutulus pins also occured almost in every cemetery containing burials of this chronological period. The same may be stated on the occurrence of strings with iron-bell shaped pendants. Thus such richness may be caused not only by higher status of families of deceased. It is argued in the article that this may have been caused by the status of females based on their young age. The elements of outfit discussed in the article should be associated with ceremonial dress which could be used during wedding ceremonies. The preparation of young female deceased as a bride might be caused by the need to ensure her special status for the entering the Other World. The wedding motif is also represented in the male graves of that period containing containers/boxes with female types of jewellry. These grave-goods were interpreted by C. Reich (2013) as ‘gifts for brides‘ in the Afterlife. The set of jewellery and ceremonial costume prepared for the wedding rites were closely personally tied to the particular girl and in the case of premature death these items could not be inherited by other family members. The burial of a girl or young female with an outfit such as those discussed here was a custom related to giving back her property for the Afterlife that could not be used during her lifetime. Such rites ensured that the girl would be initiated into the status of married woman to ensure her position among her ancestors in the Other World. The elements of burials customs and wedding ceremonies have many common features in various cultures and a motif of farewell and parting with the beloved one is strongly intertwinned in them. Such archaic traditions are not specifically related to ethnic inheritance but most probably represent archetypes of human thinking.
FUNDING
financing institution - Lithuanian Institute of History
 
REFERENCES (84)
1.
ALMGREN O. 1923: Studien über nordeuropäische Fibelformen der ersten nachchristlichen Jahrhunderte mit Berücksichtigung der provinzialrömischen und südrussischen Formen, Mannus-Bibliothek 32, Leipzig.
 
2.
BAYBURIN A.K., LEVINTON G.A. 1990: Pokhorony i svad’ba, [in:] V.V. Ivanov, L.G. Nevskaya (eds.), Issledovaniya v oblasti balto-slavyanskoy dukhovnoy kul’tury. Pogrebal’nyy obryad, Moskva, 64–99.
 
3.
BANYTĖ R. 1999: Dviejų Baitų kapinyno kapų chronologijos klausimu, “Archaeologia Lituana” 1, 63–71.
 
4.
BANYTĖ-ROWELL R. 2000: Characteristics of the end of the Roman Period according to material from Baitai grave site (near Klaipėda), “Archaeologia Baltica” 4, 27–44.
 
5.
BANYTĖ-ROWELL R. 2004: The Transition of Ideas and Northern Lithuania in the Roman Period, [in:] R. Ritums (ed.), Pētījumi zemgaļu senatnē. Rakstu krājums, Latvijas Vēstures muzeja raksti 10. Arheoloģija un antropoloģija, Rīga, 11–26.
 
6.
BANYTĖ-ROWELL R. 2007a: Dar kartą apie Šernų kapinyną A. Bezzenbergerio publikacijos ir užrašų duomenimis, “Lietuvos archeologija” 32, 9–30.
 
7.
BANYTĖ-ROWELL R. 2007b: Ażurowe okucia końca pasa – wędrówka wzoru między Gotlandią, Mazurami a Litwą zachodnią, [in:] A. Bitner-Wróblewska (ed.), Kultura bogaczewska w 20 lat później. Materiały z konferencji, Warszawa, 26–27 marca 2003, Seminarium Bałtyjskie I, Warszawa, 329–337.
 
8.
BANYTĖ-ROWELL R. 2008a: Vėlyvojo romėniškojo laikotarpio rozetiniai smeigtukai ir segės su tutuliu, “Lietuvos archeologija” 34, 9–42.
 
9.
BANYTĖ-ROWELL R. 2008b: Metallene Trachtzierrate aus einem westlitauischen Gräberfeld der römischen Kaiserzeit im «germanischen» und «sarmatischen» Kontext, [in:] O.A. RADYUSH, K.N. SKVORTSOV (eds.), Drevnosti Tsentralnoy i Vostochnoy Evropy epokhi rimskogo vliyaniya i pereseleniya narodov, Germania–Sarmatia, Kaliningrad, 104–121.
 
10.
BANYTĖ-ROWELL R. 2012a: Dovilų pietinių apylinkių mikroregionas ir archeologinių tyrimų perspektyvos, “Lietuvos archeologija” 38, 271–294.
 
11.
BANYTĖ-ROWELL R. 2012b: The Excavations at Baitai Cemetery, [in:] G. Zabiela, Z. Baubonis, E. Marcinkevičiūtė (eds.), Archaeological Investigations in Independent Lithuania 1990–2010, Vilnius, 122–126.
 
12.
BANYTĖ-ROWELL R. 2014: Gender roles in the prehistoric communities of West Lithuania’s micro-areas between the late Roman Iron Age and the Late Migration Period: continuity or change?, “Lietuvos archeologija” 40, 99–138.
 
13.
BANYTĖ-ROWELL R. 2016: West Lithuanian Cemeteries, [in:] G. Zabiela, Z. Baubonis, E. Marcinkevičiūtė (eds.), A Hundred Years of Archaeological Discoveries in Lithuania, Vilnius, 256–267.
 
14.
BANYTĖ-ROWELL R. 2019: Die Memelkultur in der Römischen Kaiserzeit. Auswertung der Archivalien aus dem Nachlass von Herbert Jankuhn, Studien zur Siedlungsgeschichte und Archäologie der Ostseegebiete 17, Mainz.
 
15.
BANYTĖ-ROWELL R. 2020: About the People Buried in the Cemetery of Baitai: their Cultural Integration throughout the Baltic Sea Region and the European Barbaricum in the 3rd Century AD, “Archäologisches Korrespondenzblatt” 50, 545–565.
 
16.
BANYTĖ-ROWELL R., BITNER-WRÓBLEWSKA A., REICH CH. 2012: Did they exist? The Question of Elites in Western Lithuania in the Roman and Early Migration Periods, and their Interregional Contacts, [in:] A. Bliujienė (ed.), People at the Crossroads of Space and Time (Footmarks of Societies in Ancient Europe) II, “Archaeologia Baltica” 18, 192–220.
 
17.
BECKMANN B. 1969: Die baltischen Metallnadeln der Römischen Kaiserzeit, SJahr. XXVI 26, 107–119.
 
18.
BECKMANN CH. 1969: Metallfingerringe der römischen Kaiserzeit im freien Germanien, SJahr. XXVI, 5–106.
 
19.
BEZZENBERGER A. 1892: Litauische Gräberfelder. I. Das Gräberfeld bei Schernen (Kreis Memel), Prussia 17 (1891/92), 141–168.
 
20.
BEZZENBERGER A. 1900: Gräberfeld bei Baiten, Kr. Memel, Prussia 21 (1896–1900), 133–135.
 
21.
BIEGELEISEN H. 1930: Śmierć w obrzędach, zwyczajach i wierzeniach ludu polskiego, Warszawa.
 
22.
BLIUJIENĖ A. 2007: Lietuvos priešistorės gintaras, Vilnius.
 
23.
BLIUJIENĖ A. 2011: Northern Gold: Amber in Lithuania (c. 100 to c. 1200), East Central and Eastern Europe in the Middle Ages, 450–1450, 18, Leiden.
 
24.
BLIUJIENĖ A., BRAČIULIENĖ R. 2018: Užpelkių kapinynas Lietuvos pajūrio ir Baltijos jūros regiono kultūriniuose kontekstuose, Vilnius.
 
25.
BLIUJIENĖ A., BUTKUS D. 2017: Roman coins in the West Lithuanian Stone Circle Graves Culture: estimated practicality or the dawn of a new phenomenon, [in:] B.V. Eriksen et alii (eds.), Interaktion ohne Grenzen / Beispiele archäologischen Forschungen am Beginn des 21. Jahrhunderts – Interaction without borders. Exemplary archaeological research at the beginning of the 21st century, Schleswig, 425–442.
 
26.
BLUMBERGS Z. 1982: Bronzebuckelchen als Trachtzier – Zu den Kontakten Gotlands mit dem Kontinent in der Älteren Römischen Eisenzeit, Theses and papers in North-European archaeology 12, Stockholm.
 
27.
BÖHME H.W. 2009: Migrants’ Fortunes: the Integration of Germanic Peoples in Late Antique Gaul, [in:] D. Quast (ed.), Foreigners in Early Medieval Europe: Thirteenth International Studies on Early Medieval Mobility, Römisch-Germanisches Zentralmuseum. Monographien 78, Mainz, 131–147.
 
28.
BUTKUS D. 1998: Lazdininkų (Kalnalaukio) kapinyno tyrinėjimai 1996-1997 metais, “Archeologiniai tyrinėjimai Lietuvoje 1996 ir 1997 metais”, Vilnius, 190–194.
 
29.
VON CARNAP-BORNHEIM C. 2000: Einige jüngerkaiserzeitliche Beispiele überregionaler Trachtbeziehungen zwischen dem baltischen und germanischen Kulturbereich, “Archaeologia Baltica” 4, 45–61.
 
30.
CZARNECKA K. 1990: Struktura społeczna ludności kultury przeworskiej. Próba rekonstrukcji na podstawie źródeł archeologicznych i analizy danych antropologicznych z cmentarzysk, Warszawa.
 
31.
DARK K.R. 1995: Theoretical Archaeology, Ithaca (NY).
 
32.
DEMERECKAS K. (ed.) 2005: Kretingos muziejus, Klaipėda.
 
33.
EGOREYCHENKO A.A. 1991: Ochkovidnye podveski na territorii SSSR, SovArh. 1991/2, 171–181.
 
34.
ENGEL C. 1931: Einführung in die vorgeschichtliche Kultur des Memellandes, Memel.
 
35.
ENGEL C. 1933: Die kaiserzeitlichen Kulturgruppen zwischen Weichsel und finnischem Meerbusen und ihr Verhältnis zueinander, Prussia 30/I, 261–286.
 
36.
FISCHER A., 1921: Zwyczaje pogrzebowe ludu polskiego, Wydawnictwa Bibljoteki Zakładu Narodowego im. Ossolińskich III, Lwów.
 
37.
FOWLER CH. 2004: The Archaeology of Personhood. An anthropological approach, Oxford.
 
38.
GARNEVIČIŪTĖ R. 2014: Katalikų laidotuvių apeigos ir papročiai Lietuvoje (XX–XXI a. sandūra), Kaunas: Vytauto Didžiojo universitetas. Doctoral dissertation (https://www.lituanistika.lt/co...; accessed 23.03.2021).
 
39.
VAN GENNEP A. 2004: The Rites of Passage, [in:] A.C.G.M. Robben (ed.), Death, Mourning and Burial. A Cross-Cultural Reader, Oxford, 213–223.
 
40.
GREIMAS A.J. 1985: Des dieux et des hommes. Études de mythologie lituanienne, Formes sémiotiques, Paris.
 
41.
HENSEL W. 1960: De la fonction des pendeloques en forme de binokle, “Archaeologia Polona” III, 155–165.
 
42.
JOVAIŠA E. 1998: Žvilgsnis į „Aukso amžių“: baltai pirmaisiais amžiais po Kristaus, Vilnius (CD-edition).
 
43.
JOVAIŠA E. 2012: Aisčiai. Kilmė, Vilnius.
 
44.
KAČKUTĖ R. 1995a: Lietuvos moterų galvos dangos papuošalai I–IV amžiais, “Baltų archeologija” 3 (6), 16–19.
 
45.
KAČKUTĖ R. 1995b: Lietuvos moterų galvos dangos papuošalai I–IV amžiais, “Baltų archeologija” 4 (7), 14–24.
 
46.
KAČKUTĖ R. 2014: Romėniškojo laikotarpio Vakarų Lietuvos ir Nemuno žemupio gyventojų socialinių santykių analizė kapinynų medžiagos pagrindu, “Lietuvos archeologija” 40, 43–72.
 
47.
KHOMYAKOVA O.A. 2010: Plastinchatye braslety sambiysko-natangiyskoy kul’tury, Germania–Sarmatia II, Kaliningrad-Kursk, 277–291.
 
48.
KULIKAUSKAS P. 1951: Kurmaičių (Kretingos r.) plokštinio kapinyno tyrinėjimai, “Lietuvos istorijos instituto darbai” 1, 315–362.
 
49.
LUCY S. 2005: The Archaeology of Age, [in:] M. Díaz-Andreu et alii (eds.), The Archaeology of Identity. Approaches to Gender, Age, Status, Ethnicity and Religion, London-New York, 43–66.
 
50.
LUND HANSEN U. 2010: Perlen und Perlenmode – Perlen als sozialer und familiärer Indikator, [in:] A. Urbaniak et alii (eds), TERRA BARBARICA. Studia ofiarowane Magdalenie Mączyńskiej w 65. rocznicę urodzin, Monumenta Archaeologica Barbarica. Series Gemina 2, Łódź-Warszawa, 87–95.
 
51.
MICHELBERTAS M. 1986: Senasis geležies amžius Lietuvoje. I–IV amžius, Vilnius.
 
52.
MICHELBERTAS M. 2001: Litauen, CRFB, Vilnius.
 
53.
MICHELBERTAS M. 2004: Pajuosčio pilkapynas. Monografija, “Archaeologija Lituana” monografijos. A serija 1, Vilnius.
 
54.
MOORA H. 1938: Die Eisenzeit in Lettland bis etwa 500 n. Chr. 2. Teil: Analyse, Verhandlungen der Gelehrnten Estnischen Gesellschaft XXIX, Tartu.
 
55.
NOWAKOWSKI W. 1996: Das Samland in der römischen Kaiserzeit und seine Verbindungen mit dem römischen Reich und der barbarischen Welt, Veröffentlichungen des Vorgeschichtlichen Seminars Marburg Sonderbd. 10, Marburg-Warszawa.
 
56.
NOWAKOWSKI W. 1999: Das Problem der Chronologie der spätrömischen Kaiserzeit und Völkerwanderungszeit im Memelgebiet hinsichtlich der Funde aus dem Gräberfeld Aukštakiemiai (Oberhof), “Archaeologia Lituana” 1, 110–118.
 
57.
PARKER PEARSON M. 1999: The Archaeology of Death and Burial, Stroud (Gloucestershire).
 
58.
PAULI L. 1975: Keltische Volksglaube, Amulette und Sonderbestattungen am Dürrnberg bei Hallein und im eisenzeitlichen Mitteleuropa, Münchner Beiträge zur Vor- und Frühgeschichte 28, München.
 
59.
PRZYBYŁA M.J. 2011: Die Regionalisierung der reiche Frauentracht und die Nachweismöglichkeiten jüngerkaiserzeitlicher Heiratskreise am Beispiel Nordeuropas, [in:] D. Quast (ed.), Weibliche Eliten in der Frühgeschichte. Female Elites in Protohistoric Europe. Internationale Tagung vom 13. Bis zum 14. Juni 2008 im RGZM im Rahmen des Forschungsschwerpunktes »Eliten«, RGZM – Tagungen 10, Mainz, 321–359.
 
60.
PRZYBYŁA M.J. 2018: Pressblechverzierte spätkaiserzeitliche Trachtbestandteile in Südskandinavien, Nordiske Fortidsminder B/28, Copenhagen.
 
61.
REICH CH. 2013: Schmuck- und Münzbeigabe in Männerbestattungen des Gräberfelds von Oberhof (Aukštkiemiai), “Acta Praehistorica et Archaeologica” 44 (2012), 131–147.
 
62.
RÜHL F. 1892: Die Münzen des Schernen Gräberfeldes, Prussia 17 (1891/92), 169–170.
 
63.
SAWICKA L., GRIŽAS G. 2007: Mogiła Wielkoludów ... Szwedów czy konfederatów. Cmentarzysko kurhanowe w Pakalniszkach (północna Litwa) w świetle badań Marii Butrymówny w 1897 roku, WA LIX, 165–202.
 
64.
SEDAKOVA O.A. 1990: Tema „doli” v pogrebal‘nom obryade (vostochno- i yuzhno-slavianskiy material), [in:] V.V. Ivanov, L.G. Nevskaya (eds), Issledovaniya v oblasti balto-slavianskoy dukhovnoy kul‘tury. Pogrebal‘nyy obryad), Moskva, 54–63.
 
65.
SHMIDEHEL'M M. 1955: Arkheologicheskie pamyatniki perioda razlozheniya rodovogo stroya na severo-vostoke Èstonii (V vek do n.è. – V vek. n.è.), Tallin.
 
66.
SKÓRA K. 2015: Struktura społeczna ludności kultury wielbarskiej, Łódź.
 
67.
SKÓRA K. 2020: Omnia mors aequat? Soziale Stratigraphien in der Römischen Kaiserzeit und Völkerwanderungszeit im Gebiet der Wielbark-Kultur, Łódź.
 
68.
SVETIKAS E. 2019: Sargėnų kapinynas, Vilnius.
 
69.
SZTER I. 2010: Cmentarzysko z okresu wpływów rzymskich i z okresu wędrówek ludów w kamieniu na Pojezierzu Mazurskim, WA LXI (2009–2010), 201–331.
 
70.
TAMULYNAS L. 1998: A. Bezzenbergerio archeologiniai tyrinėjimai Klaipėdos krašte, “Lietuvos archeologija” 15, 247–285.
 
71.
TEMPELMANN-MĄCZYŃSKA M. 1985a: Die Perlen der römischen Kaiserzeit und der frühen Phase der Völkerwanderungszeit im mitteleuropäischen Barbaricum, Römisch-Germanische Forschungen 43, Mainz am Rhein.
 
72.
TEMPELMANN-MĄCZYŃSKA M. 1985b: Części stroju kobiecego w okresie rzymskim na obszarze środkowo- i wschodnioeuropejskiego Barbaricum, Uniwersytet Jagielloński. Rozprawy habilitacyjne 98, Kraków.
 
73.
TEMPELMANN-MĄCZYŃSKA M. 1989: Das Frauentrachtzubehör des mittel- und osteuropäischen Barbaricums in der römischen Kaiserzeit, Uniwersytet Jagielloński. Varia CCLXIV, Kraków.
 
74.
THOMAS S.1967: Die germanischen Scheibenfibeln der Römischen Kaiserzeit im freien Germanien, “Berliner Jahrbuch für Vor- und Frühgeschichte” 7, 1–187.
 
75.
TISCHLER O., KEMKE H. 1902: Ostpreussische Altertümer aus der Zeit der grossen Gräberfelder nach Christi Geburt, Königsberg i. Pr.
 
76.
WAGNER W.D. 2019: Die Altertumsgesellschaft Prussia. Einblicke in ein Jahrhundert Geschichtsverein, Archäologie und Museumswesen in Ostpreußen (1844–1945), PRUSSIA-Schriftenreihe 29, Husum.
 
77.
VARNAS A. 1985: Stragnų kapinyno (Klaipėdos raj.) 1985 m. archeologinių tyrimų ataskaita, typescript of an excavation report, archives of the Lithuanian Institute of History, Vilnius (LIIR F. 1, b. 1191).
 
78.
VARNAS A. 1986: Stragnų plokštinis kapinynas, “Archeologiniai tyrinėjimai Lietuvoje 1984 ir 1985 metais”, 80–82.
 
79.
WAETZOLDT D. 1939: Zur Tracht der Bewohner des Memelgebietes in der Eisenzeit, “Alt-Preußen” 3/4, 116–120.
 
80.
WAHLE E. 1928: Die Ausgrabungen in Rutzau und Bauske, Archaioloģijas raksti I.2, Rīga.
 
81.
WASON P.K. 1994: The archaeology of rank, New studies in archaeology, Cambridge.
 
82.
WELLS P.S. 2008: Image and Response in Early Europe, Debates in Archaeology, London.
 
83.
WOŹNIAK M. 2013: An iron ball-shaped pendant from the cemetery of the Wielbark Culture in Kozłówko in northern Masovia, “Archaeologia Lituana” 14, 51–62.
 
84.
ŽULKUS V. 1995: Vakarų baltai gotų-gepidų migracijoje (I–IV a.), [in:] N. Vėlius (ed.), Lietuvininkų kraštas. Monografija, Kaunas, 74–107.
 
ISSN:0043-5082